Drug Policy Legislative Review

 

New era of drug policy change lawsuits

 

No more punishment for overdoses

 

 
 

Intention to mitigate the massive drug tests

Drug Policy Georgia
Levan Jorbenadze
Legal Advisor/Attorney
October 18, 2015

Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia issued a new specific instruction – ordinance #725 with the intention to instruct police officers in the administration of drug tests. Administrative Offences Code of Georgia punishes first time offenders with fine 500 GEL and administrative detention up to 15 days for purchase or storage of a small quantity of drugs without the intent to sell and/or use of drugs without a doctor’s prescription. If it reoffended then criminal prosecution started and punished with higher fines and up to 1 year in jail or up to the circumstances of the case even without administrative offences it might be up to 14 years or life imprisonment.  

Every single person can be subject to drug urine testing if reasonably suspected. The very first drug positive test is very important as it puts the drug user in the special list maintained by police, which is one of the unamended

and complicated list. The system of the list allows the law enforcement to determine the further arbitrary prosecution activities. The drug tests conducted under the conditions of violation of the basic human rights principles. In the most cases drug tests are useless and having direct negative impact on human dignity and life. The drug tests are subject of even of political prosecution using it as a tool against political rivals and for other illegal activities.

Massive drug tests were always subject to public criticism. With the intention to put to the end of this practice the Minister of Internal Affairs issued new instruction taking effect on October 1, 2015, but this new regulation is under question and it mostly depends how effectively it will be administered in practice. The ordinance still gives a very wide margin of interpretation to carry out drug-testing in cases such as: a) A law enforcement official witnessed drug use; b) Official while according to the law on police conducting preventive measures such as - identifying a person, carrying out frisk and examination of a person, carrying out special inspection and examination, carrying out special police control, ordering to leave a place and prohibiting entrance to a certain territory and there is enough reason to suggest a person used drugs; c) The information obtained from the criminal intelligence activities, LEPL emergency service 112 or the information from an identified person.

Even the subparagraph c) The information obtained from the criminal intelligence activities can be subject to manipulation and speculation, which was the case until 1 October, 2015 and even putting it into the instruction can make no difference. In addition the article 4 paragraph 3 of the ordinance 725 allows the use of coercive measures (use of physical force, special means) if the person refuses the drug- testing.

The instructions for police officers were one of the recommendations from public organizations and independent activists but how this new regulation with such wide interpretations will be put in practice is still up to the will of the government and judicial system.

          

 
Share |

Legal Consultation Service